Broken Dreams

As a former high school English tutor, as a child raised in part by a Mexican immigrant, and as the daughter of a high school biology teacher, who has taught many ‘limited English speaking’ classes, immigration is an issue to which I inadvertently have strong emotional ties. Immigration has been a heavily debated issue in the past couple of years and will no doubt continue to be a heated subject as the 2008 election nears. Although substantial immigration legislation was opposed in June, last Wednesday, the immigration waters were retested with a smaller piece of legislation. The senate however also rejected the Dream Act bill with a 52-44 vote, 8 short of the 60-votes needed for the bill to proceed to an actual debate on the senate floor.

The dream act (the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act) is a bill that was sponsored by Illinois senator Richard J. Durbin. The act would have given provisional legal status to illegal immigrant students who entered the country before they were 16 years of age and have since lived in the U.S. for at least 5 years. One of the main concerns for conservative republicans is that they believe illegal immigrants are “lawbreakers” and therefore should not be “rewarded” with amnesty or citizenship. The counter argument however, and basis for the Dream Act is that these students did not have a say in entering the country and therefore should not be penalized by their parents’ decisions. The dream Act targets students who were brought into the country by their parents when they were very young. These students would have had to complete high school and have no criminal record in order to gain this provisional legal status.

If in addition to completing their primary education, these students either attended 2 years of college or served 2 years in the U.S. military, the provisional status would be lifted and they would be able to apply for citizenship after 5 years. Although it was a small piece of legislation compared to the broad legislation presented last summer, “negative votes came from Republicans and some Democrats who were reluctant to reopen the bitterly divisive debate over immigration for what they called a narrow piece of legislation”. Why are senators afraid to reopen the debate? Because any kind of ‘solution’ would be both controversial and expensive.

Americans are spending money and resources to educate immigrant students and though they are motivated and qualify to attend college, many Americans would rather have them deported than actually have them contribute to the U.S. economy. This is in part because the majority of illegal immigrants (approximately 80%) are Latino, of which about 60% are Mexican. In the minds of many U.S., (especially California) residents, Mexican immigrants are responsible for “stealing American jobs”, overpopulating and lowering standards in public schools, and taking up resources that they have no legal rights to. Many Americans envision “illegal aliens” to be Mexican families crossing the boarder by jumping fences or hiding in the trunks of cars. However, Maria Echeveste, former deputy chief of staff under President Clinton, told UC Berkeley students in a lecture last Wednesday, that a majority of illegal immigrants are actually legal workers who overstay their work visas.

She highlighted the hypocrisy in the temporary worker programs. “We are benefiting from having a workforce with no rights”. She argued that Americans want temporary workers who will work for low wages, perform jobs that few Americans would be willing to perform, but we do not want to grant these people citizenship. Because most illegal immigrants come into the country legally on temporary work visas, spending more money on ‘securing the border’ would be both costly and ineffective. Trying to deport the 12 million illegal immigrants that are already currently residing in the U.S. would also be a misuse of resources. In order to find all of the illegal immigrants and send them home, it would take over 5 years and cost more than the entire budget of the department of Homeland Security (according to the Center for American Progress).

The Dream act was a small attempt to give rights to immigrant students. Students who have worked just as hard, if not harder than American students to receive an education and motivate themselves to achieve more than was ever expected of them. Students that are willing to fight in the military for a country that they are not allowed to call their own. What is the point in spending taxpayers’ money to educate these students, push them to want a college education, and then not allow them the right to American citizenship?

When did the American dream become a dream with restrictions and boundaries? A dream only for the “lucky ones” who were born in the U.S.?

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

When did the inscription on the Statue of Liberty, our national monument, and the symbol of our heritage lose its meaning?